LA mayor candidate Spencer Pratt distances himself from past 9/11 conspiracy comments, says he was ‘young and naive’

LA Mayor Candidate Spencer Pratt Reconsiders 9/11 Conspiracy Claims, Cites Personal Growth

LA mayor candidate Spencer Pratt distances – Spencer Pratt, a rising figure in the Los Angeles mayor’s race, has taken a step back from his earlier beliefs in 9/11 conspiracy theories, attributing his past views to youthful inexperience. During a recent interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, the former reality TV star acknowledged his transformation over two decades, emphasizing that his current perspective is shaped by life lessons and a broader understanding of governance.

Early 9/11 Conspiracy Beliefs

Before becoming a prominent figure in the insurgent campaign for Los Angeles mayor, Pratt was deeply engaged with conspiracy theories, particularly those popularized by Alex Jones. In 2009, he actively promoted the controversial film “Loose Change,” which claims the September 11 attacks were orchestrated by government insiders. At the time, Pratt shared posts on X, now known as Twitter, urging followers to watch the documentary, stating, “anyone who can watch that and not see the truth is blind!”

These remarks were part of a larger effort to align with Jones’ 9/11 Truth movement, which argues that the attacks were not the result of external forces but coordinated efforts from within the United States. Pratt’s commitment to these theories was further solidified during an appearance on Jones’ radio show, where he confirmed his belief in the inside job narrative. “Not from my research, but from your research, it 100% is,” he said, referring to Jones’ work. He also highlighted conspiracy theories surrounding the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, noting that his awareness of these claims came only after watching Jones’ films.

Evolution of Perspective

Pratt’s current stance reflects a significant shift in his thinking, particularly after the devastating Palisades fire in January 2025. This event, which destroyed his home in the Los Angeles neighborhood, prompted him to reevaluate his views on government accountability. “It’s actually worse than a conspiracy,” he told Tapper, explaining that he now sees systemic failures as more impactful than deliberate plots. “It’s that we have people in charge that make mistakes that get people killed.”

Pratt admitted he was “young and naive” during his early days of supporting conspiracy theories, especially those that questioned the mainstream media’s coverage of 9/11. He described his past beliefs as a product of limited knowledge and a fascination with alternative narratives. “I believe a lot of people failed to allow the al Qaeda terrorists to get in,” he said, suggesting that government negligence, rather than coordinated attacks, was the root of the tragedy. This evolution in thought has led him to distance himself from his former assertions, which he now considers outdated and less relevant to contemporary issues.

Controversial Remarks and Apologies

Pratt’s journey into conspiracy theory was not limited to 9/11. After his reality TV show, “The Hills,” was canceled in 2010, he humorously referred to the event as “our 9/11,” a metaphor he later apologized for, calling it a “thoughtless analogy.” This moment of self-reflection marked an early step in his transition from fringe beliefs to a more measured approach to politics.

His connection with Jones extended beyond 2009. In 2017, Pratt and his wife Heidi Montag returned to the radio show in an in-person interview, which coincided with their vacation in Hawaii. During the conversation, they discussed their decision to step away from the spotlight of reality television to prioritize family life. Jones, however, reminded them of the earlier warning he had given about potential threats to their safety for supporting his theories. Pratt responded with air quotes, saying, “Our lawyer was allegedly – He’s no longer alive, right, when this was all happening.”

Pratt’s remarks also touched on broader societal concerns, including the “New World Order” and fluoride conspiracies. He and Montag shared their belief in the biblical “Mark of the Beast,” which they associated with microchip implants. While government microchip implants are a real technological development, Pratt admitted they were not yet widespread, and his earlier fervor on the topic has since cooled.

Political Campaign and Context

Pratt’s campaign for Los Angeles mayor has been fueled by frustration over the city’s response to the Palisades fire, which destroyed his home. This personal experience has influenced his focus on government efficiency and accountability. Despite being a registered Republican, he has downplayed his party affiliation in the race, instead cultivating support from right-wing media outlets. This strategic move positions him as a unifying figure in a nonpartisan jungle primary set for June 2, where the top two candidates will advance to the November general election.

His reappearance in public life has drawn attention to his past views, with some critics pointing to his earlier endorsements of Alex Jones and the “Loose Change” film. However, Pratt has framed his evolution as a natural progression, emphasizing that his current priorities are rooted in practical concerns rather than speculative theories. “The person I am now is very different than the person before January 7th,” he said, invoking the date of the Palisades fire as a symbol of his growth.

While his past comments may still be a point of discussion, Pratt is now focused on addressing the challenges facing Los Angeles, including infrastructure, public safety, and economic recovery. His ability to adapt his messaging and acknowledge past mistakes has positioned him as a candidate who is both reflective and forward-thinking. As he prepares to face voters, the contrast between his earlier conspiratorial stance and his current perspective underscores the changing landscape of his political identity.

The resurfaced posts and comments, some of which were first reported by MSNOW, have become a talking point in the media. Yet, Pratt remains confident that his journey has been one of learning and growth. “I’ve had 20 years of regret,” he said, but added that these remarks do not define his current character or values. Instead, they serve as a reminder of his past enthusiasm for alternative narratives and his willingness to reassess them in light of new experiences.